‘Made in China’ – What Does it Mean for America and the Rest of the World?
  • Wed, 04/18/2012 - 00:00

By Congressman Jeff Fortenberry
Syracuse Journal-Democrat
Posted Apr 18, 2012 @ 03:54 PM

Washington D.C. — As I was shopping for some family items recently, I was reminded of just how difficult it is to find products that are “made in America.”  While American manufacturing is, encouragingly, on the rebound, most consumer items in our nation, ranging from hairbrushes to iPods, still carry a “made in China” label.
 
All the while, many questions about China and its economic policies, foreign policies, and human rights record are left mostly unexamined.  For the good of our national security and international stability, it is essential that China’s record and intentions be thoroughly understood.
 
A key concern is our nations’ complicated, lopsided economic relationship. Essentially, Americans buy great quantities of Chinese-made products as the Chinese government finances a great portion of the U.S. debt.  Currently, nearly one-third of our debt is foreign owned, with China easily being the largest debt-holder at nearly $1.2 trillion (officially).  Other estimates peg the figure at $2 trillion.  The effect of such indebtedness is the shift of our wealth assets into the hands of a foreign nation.  China has lax labor and environmental standards and manipulates its currency, creating unbalanced trading conditions.  
 
Another concern is China’s involvement on the world stage.  While it aggressively pursues its own mercantilist agenda, China lends little constructive hand to creating the conditions for international stability.  China is seen as an enabler of North Korea, which continues its march toward nuclear weapons development despite the protests of the international community.  Over recent months, as the U.S. and the European Union have accelerated important efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions, China has been conspicuously absent from leadership in the discussion.  China continues to be a top buyer of Iranian oil—one of the key leverage points of economic sanctions against Iran.  At a discussion I attended, a Chinese official said, in so many words, the U.S. is to blame for Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability.  And while China does not desire this outcome, China would continue to conduct business as usual with the Iranians.  
 
China’s influence in resource-rich Africa is growing rapidly – with disturbing consequences. Direct Chinese investment in Africa has grown exponentially over the last two years. One million Chinese nationals now do business in Africa, and Chinese energy and minerals resources companies are quickly acquiring oil fields and mines.  In the process, China has forged strategic alliances with war criminals. According to China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, China shares a “deep and profound friendship,” with Sudanese war criminal Omar al-Bashir.  Africa is becoming a lost continent, diplomatically and economically, to other international players who do not have the same regard for human rights as we do.
 
Beyond this, an honest discussion is necessary about Chinese industrial virtues.  A Chinese official has said that, in dealing with “differences in corporate culture and the degree of openness to the outside world . . . Chinese companies always take domestic business practices with them.” Those “domestic business practices,” according to witnesses who have given congressional testimony, include fertility monitors on factory floors, invasively examining female employees for pregnancy and reporting pregnant women to the Chinese family planning police.  China still practices the violence of forced abortions. China also has tragically high suicide rates for workers, who use suicide as their only means of collective bargaining against dire and oppressive labor violations.
 
As China continues to advance as a world economic power, it has a choice: it can join the responsible community of nations in respecting the dignity and rights of all persons while conducting affairs with other nations in an ethical fashion, or it can stand by current practices and exploit relationships in order to fuel its own brand of corporate collectivism, undermining international stability in the process.
 
It is important that we seek reasonable and good relations with China—ideally and practically—for the sake of our own national security. But we must do so with open eyes.  As Americans, we must begin to address some of the hard questions that arise in our own relationship with China, and pause to consider the implications before reaching for another product carrying the “made in China” label.
 

Categories: