70 years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Closing the Implementation Gap
  • Thu, 03/01/2018 - 16:27

February 28, 2018 3:30PM EST

Human Rights Watch Statement to High-level Panel on 70th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and 25th Anniversary of the Vienna Declaration and Program of Action

The values enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are as relevant and timeless today as they were 70 years ago. During this celebration of its adoption, it is important to acknowledge the gap between its promise and its implementation.

This is a challenging time for human rights advocates: a time when many human rights norms and standards are under threat, when we are witnessing a rise in xenophobic populism, profiling on racial and religious grounds, attacks on human rights defenders, and pushback against multilateral institutions, including this Council.

It is therefore timely to reflect on what “universality” means, 70 years on, and its applicability to today’s challenges:

It means that all human beings are entitled to full realization of all of their rights, without exception. It means that there can be no category of “second-class human” – be they women, ethnic or religious minorities, or LGBT people.

It means that migrants don’t check their human rights at the border, despite the Hungarian foreign minister’s shameful assertion to this Council that people are entitled to human rights “where they live,” and that “migration is dangerous, stoppable and we have to stop it.”

It means that we need to stand together in this body in defense of all who face discrimination, whether they be Rohingya Muslims facing ethnic cleansing in Myanmar, women facing sexual violence in South Sudan, people of color subject to racism in policing in the US, Uyghurs and Tibetans unable to freely practice their religion in China, alleged drug users summarily executed in the Philippines, or LGBT people facing violence and discrimination in Russia.

An injury to one is an injury to all of us.

It means bringing full attention to economic, social and cultural rights, as well as civil and political rights, and it also means an end to selectivity: no state should be above scrutiny, and Council members such as Egypt, China, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela, should expect that their own human rights records will be subject to particular scrutiny during their time on the Council.

Of course, the opposite of universality is relativism, and as the Secretary-General reminded us at the session opening: “we must overcome the false dichotomy between human rights and national sovereignty.” To this end, we urge states to resist attempts to insert a relativist agenda into UN resolutions, such as we saw in China’s resolution on development, selectively quoting from international instruments.

The VDPA affirms the essential work of civil society, and we call on all states to repeal pernicious “foreign agent” laws and other legislation designed to impede the work of nongovernmental organizations.

Similarly important is strengthening multilateral human rights institutions, not defunding, undermining or threatening to withdraw from them.

My question for the panelists is this: the UDHR hasn’t changed. It’s withstood the test of time. But has our commitment to its values? What do you see as the current challenges to its implementation, and how can members and observers of this body work together across our differences to meet those challenges?

Categories: